So, as AMD’s original 16-core Zen 2 flagship has now been formally launched, we now know for a indisputable truth that the Ryzen 3000 lineup received’t be restricted to the 12-core 3900X. Per AMD’s first-birthday party benchmarks, the Ryzen 9 3950X is faster than Intel’s i9-9960X, but as per a original Geekbench web, the 7nm AMD flagship may perchance almost definitely also unbiased be even extra highly effective in sure scenarios. It rankings a in fact perfect 61,072 aspects within the multi-core test which is the ideal for any client CPU, period. The closest Intel competitor is the 18-core i9-9980XE (with 46618 aspects) which will get left a ways within the support of with a margin of greater than 14K aspects, the total whereas costing greater than twice as significant (Ryzen 3950X~$749, i9-9980XE~$2000+).
The particular piece is that that is an early sample, slower than the supreme chips that will hit the market. We’re a corrupt clock of three.29GHz and a boost of 4.29, whereas the 3950X in its supreme negate runs at 4.7GHz when below load. No topic that, alternatively, the one core efficiency and the IPC of the 16-core AMD flagship is increased than the 9th Gen Intel lineup. Most efficient the increased clocked i7s and i9s put collectively to match it within the one-core test. Furthermore, the chip is running on an X470 board and the cache dimension alongside with the Matisse codename verify that this certainly is the Ryzen 9 3950X, and no longer a future Threadripper piece. Here are the multi-core and single-core efficiency charts:
Appears to be like as if Intel received’t be coming out of this one unscathed. What attain you suspect? Will you be seeking the Ryzen 9 or attain you serene belief Intel?
Be taught extra: